...okay to explain
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
( cut 'cause I'm feeling generous )
( oh commercials )
It is 21:26 Wednesday 5 November 2008, and I am having my first crisis of conscience over a character death! Oh no! I need to keep writing my NaNo, but there is absolutely no way to continue and avoid this character death. Alas! I should not have given the old man a name, much less have suggested that in this particular scene he is proudly reliving his glory days in escorting two lovely young ladies to the capital. I feel as if the only way to make this worse would be to have him start telling the girls about how he used to take the one’s mother and aunt to balls just like this one, and—
OH GOD NOLDY, I’M SO SORRY.
I mean I named him “Noldy” even, which wasn’t very nice. I mean, geeze, one indignity after another.
If you bring up the fact that the characters are based on real people
then you get sucked into an argument as to whether or not Thackeray is subjective or objective to said characters.
If you get stuck in a subjectivity/objectivity argument,
then you end up discussing whether or not the narrator succeeds in his portrayal of the characters
and then you end up coming out either for or against Becky or Amelia.
If you discuss being for or against Becky or Amelia,
then you will discuss how the narrator treats them
and you might go for Lady Jane
and you might look at how their relationship affects the structure.
If you come out for or against the narrator,
Then you will probably come out for or against the structure of the novel.
If you discuss the moral of the novel,
Then you will probably end up concluding it either
a) has no moral or
b) has a horribly depressing moral.